Representing the Students
April 23rd, 2008 at 2:23 am, 22 months agoI was elected Tuesday to a Loyola’s Student Affairs Unified Planning Committee as part of Shared Governance.
I was elected by Unified Student Government… sweet!
On the committee there are 4 undergraduate students, one graduate student, two staff members, two faculty members, and one representative from the VP of Student Affairs office (who happens to be the Dean of Students, but it doesn’t have to be.)
What does this all mean? Well, I’m only 90% sure… but from what I have been able to tell I am 1 of 10 people at the university that can vote on/bring up proposed policy changes in regards to student affairs and then send them to be implemented. If they are not properly implemented or implemented in a manor that pleases the committee, the committee can appeal to the president of the university directly for him to take action. Of course, if it is a MAJOR thing then it goes up to the Board of Trustees, but the only way I could see the board having to pay attention to our committee would be if there was a request to change the student fees.
Here is a situation that I could see possibly coming up:
Loyola offers new apartment style housing, with 12 month leases, that students can take advantage of if they pay for it. Now, this is a new style of housing, so a lot of the other rules about what happens in housing probably wouldn’t apply the same way. The student handbook needs to be updated. The student affairs committee would take a look at the situation, ask for information from people involved in the project, look at things like insurance, upkeep costs and what other schools do in similar situations and then the UPC would request to amend the student handbook to reflect these new policies. These resolutions are passed by the committee, the VP of students does a quick once over and it is added to the handbook.
Now, say the VP of Students says “no way, we are NOT allowing people to paint their walls”, we can go to the president and say “the VP of Students doesn’t want people to be able to paint their walls, but these students are entering into 12 month contracts for basically apartments, so as long as they switch it back to white in 12 months we think it will be OK.” The President would look at the situation, gather information, and most likely implement the UPCs agenda. The UPC represents the opinion of all the parts of the university (students, faculty and staff), so if the president says no he is basically saying no to every person in the university.
But it isn’t just willy nilly, things like the mission of the university and what is best for all people need to be part of the discussion. For example, condom distribution… uhh… not gonna happen at a catholic university. Not saying it isn’t a really good idea, but very ‘un-catholic’ (not to mention it would be shot down immediately by the president if he even heard of it being approved, no matter if people started knocking on his door (a door I can see right now from my window) at 3AM every night)

